blob: 60ad21a760a1c282278be23dd91d7d177613a451 [file] [log] [blame]
Stefan Tauner25ffba72011-11-13 23:03:30 +00001= BBAR on ICH8 =
2 There is no sign of BBAR (BIOS Base Address Configuration Register) in the
3 public datasheet (or specification update) of the ICH8. Also, the offset of
4 that register has changed between ICH7 (SPIBAR + 50h) and ICH9 (SPIBAR +
5 A0h), so we have no clue if or where it is on ICH8. Out current policy is to
6 not touch it at all and assume/hope it is 0.
7
David Hendricksa9d6d1a2019-11-19 19:29:26 -08008= SMM BIOS Write Protection =
9Sometimes a hardware vendor will enable "SMM BIOS Write Protect" (SMM_BWP)
10in the firmware during boot time. The bits that control SMM_BWP are in the
11BIOS_CNTL register in the LPC interface.
12
13When enabled, the SPI flash can only be written when the system is operating in
14in System Management Mode (SMM). In other words, only certain code that was
15installed by the BIOS can write to the flash chip. Programs that run in OS
16context such as flashrom can still read the flash chip, but cannot write to the
17flash chip.
18
19Flashrom will attempt to detect this and print a warning such as the following:
20"Warning: BIOS region SMM protection is enabled!"
21
22Many vendor-supplied firmware update utilities do not actually write to the ROM;
23instead they transfer data to/from memory which is read/written by a routine
24running in SMM and is responsible for writing to the firmware ROM. This causes
25severe system performance degradataion since all processors must be in SMM
26context (ring -2) instead of OS context (ring 0) while the firmware ROM is being
27written.
28
Stefan Tauner25ffba72011-11-13 23:03:30 +000029= Accesses beyond region bounds in descriptor mode =
30 Intel's flash image tool will always expand the last region so that it covers
31 the whole flash chip, but some boards ship with a different configuration.
32 It seems that in descriptor mode all addresses outside the used regions can not
33 be accessed whatsoever. This is not specified anywhere publicly as far as we
34 could tell. flashrom does not handle this explicitly yet. It will just fail
35 when trying to touch an address outside of any region.
36 See also http://www.flashrom.org/pipermail/flashrom/2011-August/007606.html
37
Stefan Taunerd94d25d2012-07-28 03:17:15 +000038= (Un)locking the ME region =
Stefan Tauner2abab942012-04-27 20:41:23 +000039 If the ME region is locked by the FRAP register in descriptor mode, the host
Stefan Taunerd94d25d2012-07-28 03:17:15 +000040 software is not allowed to read or write any address inside that region.
41 Although the chipset datasheets specify that "[t]he contents of this register
42 are that of the Flash Descriptor" [PANTHER], this is not entirely true.
43 The firmware has to fill at least some of the registers involved. It is not
44 known when they become read-only or any other details, but there is at least
45 one HM67-based board, that provides an user-changeable setting in the firmware
46 user interface to enable ME region updates that lead to a FRAP content that is
47 not equal to the descriptor region bits [NC9B].
48
49 There are different ways to unlock access:
Stefan Tauner2abab942012-04-27 20:41:23 +000050
51 - A pin strap: Flash Descriptor Security Override Strap (as indicated by the
52 Flash Descriptor Override Pin Strap Status (FDOPSS) in HSFS. That pin is
53 probably not accessible to end users on consumer boards (every Intel doc i
54 have seen stresses that this is for debugging in manufacturing only and
55 should not be available for end users).
56 The ME indicates this in bits [19:16] (Operation Mode) in the HFS register of
57 the HECI/MEI PCI device by setting them to 4 (SECOVR_JMPR) [MODE_CTRL].
58
59 - Intel Management Engine BIOS Extension (MEBx) Disable
60 This option may be available to end users on some boards usually accessible
61 by hitting ctrl+p after BIOS POST. Quote: "'Disabling' the Intel ME does not
62 really disable it: it causes the Intel ME code to be halted at an early stage
63 of the Intel ME's booting so that the system has no traffic originating from
64 the Intel ME on any of the buses." [MEBX] The ME indicates this in
65 bits [19:16] (Operation Mode) in the HFS register of the HECI/MEI PCI device
66 by setting them to 3 (Soft Temporary Disable) [MODE_CTRL].
67
68 - Previous to Ibex Peak/5 Series chipsets removing the DIMM from slot (or
69 channel?) #0 disables the ME completely, which may give the host access to
70 the ME region.
71
72 - HMRFPO (Host ME Region Flash Protection Override) Enable MEI command
73 This is the most interesting one because it allows to temporarily disable
74 the ME region protection by software. The ME indicates this in bits [19:16]
75 (Operation Mode) in the HFS register of the HECI/MEI PCI device by setting
76 them to 5 (SECOVER_MEI_MSG) [MODE_CTRL].
77
78== MEI/HECI ==
79 Communication between the host software and the different services provided by
80 the ME is done via a packet-based protocol that uses MMIO transfers to one or
81 more virtual PCI devices. Upon this layer there exist various services that can
82 be used to read out hardware management values (e.g. temperatures, fan speeds
83 etc.). The lower levels of that protocol are well documented:
84 The locations/offsets of the PCI MMIO registers are noted in the chipset
85 datasheets. The actually communication is documented in a whitepaper [DCMI] and
86 an outdated as well as a current Linux kernel implementation (currently in
87 staging/ exist [KERNEL]. There exists a patch that re-implements this in user
88 space (as part of flashrom).
89
90== Problems ==
91 The problem is that only very few higher level protocols are documented publicly,
92 especially the bunch of messages that contain the HMRFPO commands is probably
93 well protected and only documented in ME-specific docs and the BIOS writer's
94 guides. We are aware of a few leaked documents though that give us a few hints
95 about it, but nothing substantial regarding its implementation.
96
97 The documents are somewhat contradicting each other in various points which
98 might be due to factual changes in process of time or due to the different
99 capabilities of the ME firmwares, example:
100
101 Intel's Flash Programming Tool (FPT) "automatically stops ME writing to SPI
102 ME Region, to prevent both writing at the same time, causing data corruption." [ME8]
103
104 "FPT is not HMRFPO-capable, so needs [the help of the FDOPS pin] HDA_SDO if
105 used to update the ME Region." [SPS]
106
107 When looking at the various ME firmware editions (and different chipsets), things
108 get very unclear. Some docs say that HMRFPO needs to be sent before End-of-POST
109 (EOP), others say that the ME region can be updated in the field or that some
110 vendor tools use it for updates. This needs to be investigated further before
111 drawing any conclusion.
112
Stefan Taunerd94d25d2012-07-28 03:17:15 +0000113[PANTHER] Intel 7 Series Chipset Family Platform Controller Hub (PCH) Datasheet
114 Document Number: 326776, April 2012, page 857
115[NC9B] Jetway NC9B flashrom v0.9.5.2-r1517 log with ME region unlocked.
116 NB: "FRAP 0e0f" vs. "FLMSTR1 0a0b".
117 http://paste.flashrom.org/view.php?id=1215
Stefan Tauner2abab942012-04-27 20:41:23 +0000118[MODE_CTRL] Client Platform Enabling Tour: Platform Software
119 Document Number: 439167, Revision 1.2, page 52
120[MEBX] Intel Management Engine BIOS Extension (MEBX) User's Guide
121 Revision 1.2, Section 3.1 and 3.5
122[DCMI] DCMI Host Interface Specification
123 Revision 1.0
124[KERNEL] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=tree;f=drivers/staging/mei;hb=HEAD
125[SPI_PROG] Ibex Peak SPI Programming Guide
126 Document Number: 403598, Revision 1.3, page 79
127[ME8] Manufacturing with Intel Management Engine (ME) Firmware 8.X on Intel 7 Series
128 Revision 2.0, page 59
129[SPS] Manufacturing with Intel Management Engine (ME) on Intel C600 Series Chipset 1
130 for Romley Server 2 Platforms using Server Platform Services (SPS) Firmware
131 Revision 2.2, page 51