)]}'
{
  "log": [
    {
      "commit": "312433cd3d90ebd5ee44bc1795b10e3846c1f96c",
      "tree": "b9797382071153359c87386163f70bdfbd074da0",
      "parents": [
        "82ca09f1f372200046dad13db6e81829ff067caf"
      ],
      "author": {
        "name": "Nico Huber",
        "email": "nico.h@gmx.de",
        "time": "Sat Sep 28 03:15:48 2019 +0200"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Nico Huber",
        "email": "nico.h@gmx.de",
        "time": "Fri Oct 04 21:34:26 2019 +0000"
      },
      "message": "gma pcode: Move and revise mailbox handling\n\nUnify the PCODE mailbox implementations (Linux\u0027 i915 uses the same\nimplementation since Sandy Bridge, too) and add `Wait` and `Success`\nparameters so we can act correctly if something failed. This adds\na lot of boilerplate. But we keep it contained in the new package\n`PCode` and the code outside it looks cleaner and handles errors\nmore gracefully.\n\nIn GNATprove, we track state of the mailbox\u0027 readiness in a ghost\nvariable `Mailbox_Ready`. This allows us to skip the initial wait\nloop if we know that we already waited at the end of a previous\ncall. The first call to a mailbox procedure has to be made with\n`Wait_Ready \u003d\u003e True`.\n\nAlso, start to experiment with a `use` clause for the `Register`\npackage. It allows us to write a little more condensed code, with-\nout sacrificing much (in this program we can expect that `Read`/\n`Write` means register access?) So far it looks good?\n\nChange-Id: I5daa3effb7ab774e4a35bd8794b0f67f57e4caa4\nSigned-off-by: Nico Huber \u003cnico.h@gmx.de\u003e\nReviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/libgfxinit/+/35710\nReviewed-by: Angel Pons \u003cth3fanbus@gmail.com\u003e\n"
    }
  ]
}