tree 73e1e07c595028935a4183b628101b95c53fd660
parent b8a90d0a8c4b9b1a037f763e8792ae4c5363b4fb
author Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com> 1644908815 +1100
committer Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> 1672359407 +0100

flashchips.c: add writeprotect support for more chips

Chips I had available for testing were tested with all writeprotect
commands and an FT232H adapter. Chips I wasn't able to test were just
checked against the datasheets.

Chips used for testing (including chips added in previous patches) are
listed in the table below:

Flashrom Chip name               | Chip(s) tested
---------------------------------+----------------------------
AT25SL128A                       |
EN25QH128                        |
GD25LQ128C/GD25LQ128D/GD25LQ128E | GD25LQ128DSIG
GD25LQ64(B)                      | GD25LQ64CWIG
GD25Q127C/GD25Q128C              | GD25Q127CSIG, GD25Q128ESIG
GD25Q256D                        | GD25Q256DYIG
GD25Q64(B)                       | GD25Q64CSIG
W25Q128.JW.DTR                   |
W25Q128.V..M                     |
W25Q128.W                        |
W25Q256JV_M                      |
W25Q256.V                        |
W25Q64.W                         |
XM25QH128C                       |
XM25QH256C                       |

Tested: flashrom --wp-{enable,disable,range,list,status}

Change-Id: I7f3d4c4148056098a845b5c64308b0333ebda395
Signed-off-by: Nikolai Artemiev <nartemiev@google.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom/+/62214
Original-Reviewed-by: Anastasia Klimchuk <aklm@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/flashrom-stable/+/70976
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>