)]}'
{
  "commit": "3a25fea9e7726109df0c09aaacefb446ab1a9d0d",
  "tree": "7e0d39872f7c96eec1cc3be521eb99b33ac91fd2",
  "parents": [
    "1b0ba893529cf93ae54b91607d93d3ad49c259e5"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Carl-Daniel Hailfinger",
    "email": "c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net",
    "time": "Sun Jun 20 11:02:33 2010 +0000"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Carl-Daniel Hailfinger",
    "email": "c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net",
    "time": "Sun Jun 20 11:02:33 2010 +0000"
  },
  "message": "The SPI opcode 0xd8 is not a chip erase opcode on any chip out there\n\nBesides that, the function as implemented just walks the chip and\nignores sector sizes.\nSector erase with SPI opcode 0xd8 is of course still supported.\nKill a declaration for a nonexisting function while we\u0027re at it.\n\nCorresponding to flashrom svn r1054.\n\nSigned-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger \u003cc-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net\u003e\nAcked-by: Sean Nelson \u003caudiohacked@gmail.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "7339e2dfdfb9309b9ea8ccf1bff7acfca3d85163",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "chipdrivers.h",
      "new_id": "aeee0954cffeb0a1f5e09c470c93ee11f1a8b089",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "chipdrivers.h"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "83ca20f96b1fb3dbbd890e0ea2010ea4ee897fcd",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "spi25.c",
      "new_id": "51be3971ee0548a3d62fdada108d86454ee13129",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "spi25.c"
    }
  ]
}