Standardize on using __func__ instead of __FUNCTION__
The __func__ variant is standardized in C99 and recommended to be
used instead of __FUNCTION__ in the gcc info page.
Only _very_ old versions of gcc did not know about __func__, but we've
been using both __func__ and __FUNCTION__ for a long while now, and
nobody complained about this, so all our users seem to use recent
enough compilers.
Corresponding to flashrom svn r711.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
diff --git a/sst28sf040.c b/sst28sf040.c
index 35f8c27..d3d7bdb 100644
--- a/sst28sf040.c
+++ b/sst28sf040.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
chip_writeb(RESET, bios);
programmer_delay(10);
- printf_debug("%s: id1 0x%02x, id2 0x%02x\n", __FUNCTION__, id1, id2);
+ printf_debug("%s: id1 0x%02x, id2 0x%02x\n", __func__, id1, id2);
if (id1 == flash->manufacture_id && id2 == flash->model_id)
return 1;